Congress and Corruption- Hand in Hand

                                    Robert A. Levine    3-22-12

 The number of cases of corruption and ethics transgression involving individual members of Congress over the years has helped contribute to the abysmal ratings of America’s national legislative bodies in the eyes of the public.  However, the extent of self-dealing, along with personal and family enrichment by these elected representatives of the people is given transparency by a 346 page report by CREW, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

Instead of going to Washington to serve their constituents, it appears that the majority of the members of Congress are going to the Capitol to serve themselves. With a detailed examination of the records of each House member during the last two election cycles, Crew was able to show that over half of them or their families profited through their offices. Crew analyzed “campaign spending, budget earmarks, office accounts and lobbying by any relatives.” They found an extraordinary amount of money was generated by Congressional members for themselves or relatives through “creative accounting, self-interested budgeting and generous expense reimbursements.”

Numerous examples are given involving members of both parties in an article in the New York Times (http://nyti.ms/GHSE7C). It can at least be said that while passing laws in a bipartisan manner is close to impossible, gaming the system is an accepted bipartisan enterprise.

Though this thorough analysis of Congressional members only involved a four year period, this kind of behavior has been going on throughout the institution’s history and is common practice. The public has forgotten the House Banking Overdraft Scandal of the late 80s and early 90s in which hundreds of members of Congress issued 20,000 bad checks for $10.8 million dollars without any penalties or fees. Among the prominent perpetrators were Republicans Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich, and the Democratic House Speaker at that time, Tom Foley. (A more detailed account of this scandal can be obtained by downloading a free addendum to my book Resurrecting Democracy from my website http://www.robertlevinebooks.com/ – A History of Political Corruption Through 1992)

Forget transparency! Forget ethics! The sad part of this recent revelation by CREW is that many of these practices by House members are not illegal and do not violate House ethics rules. As long as the two parties play ball together in terms of allowing members to enhance their incomes in any way possible, even though they won’t play ball legislatively, little can be done to change the rules or make them act in a less self-serving fashion. This is more reason to consider the formation of centrist third party whose members come to the plate clean and make ethics reform in Washington a central tenet of their beliefs and action.

 Resurrecting Democracy
www.robertlevinebooks.com

Amnesia or Forgiveness? American Voters Disregard of Ethics Violations

Amnesia or Forgiveness? America Voters’ Disregard of Ethic Violations
                                    Robert A. Levine    1-11-12
In the current Republican presidential primaries, Newt Gingrich has garnered significant levels of support despite past ethical “missteps.” He was involved in the House banking scandal with bad checks in the late 80s and early 90s. The House Ethics Committee levied a $300,000 fine on him in 1997 for using non-profit organizations for partisan political purposes. He excoriated President Clinton for sexual improprieties while he himself was married and having an affair with a much younger woman. There was also a sweetheart deal Gingrich made with a publisher in 1994 that gave him a $4.5 million advance. The pattern of unethical behavior is clear, yet has been disregarded by many voters.

By voting for them again, Americans repeatedly seem willing to forgive politicians’ ethical lapses, questionable conduct and frank hypocrisy, or are citizens simply amnesic?    
      
Almost daily, there are revelations about elected officials at municipal, state and federal levels who are guilty of ethical transgressions or frank felonies. Democracy is supposed to act as a check on officeholders who utilize their positions for venal purposes. Periodically, the voters sit in judgment of those they have elected and are able to dismiss them. And those who have committed egregious offenses can be recalled through petitions and special elections. But that rarely happens.

The electorate is far too lenient in the way it indulges ethically-challenged politicians. Sitting officeholders have been re-elected by their constituents while criminal charges were pending and the evidence of guilt was overwhelming. And ethics violations often seem to mean nothing to the voters, even when affirmed by established ethics committees or independent watchdog groups.

In addition to Gingrich, examples abound. Mary Jo Kopechne drowned at Chappaquidick when Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy was apparently driving drunk and went off a bridge into the water. He left the scene of the accident without reporting it and did not go to the police to try and rescue the woman. Yet in spite of his conduct, his constituents in Massachusetts saw fit to send him back to Washington repeatedly.

Republican David Vitter, a family values religious conservative from Louisiana was involved with prostitutes both before and after his election to the Senate in 2004 and was re-elected in 2010 after all the information regarding this became public.

Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona was rebuked by the Senate Ethics Committee for his actions as one of the Keating Five in the late 1980s. McCain and the others interceded with federal regulators of the banking industry on behalf of Charles Keating and the Lincoln Savings Bank after having received hundreds of thousands of dollars from Keating. The senators were able to block the closing of the corrupt bank, costing taxpayers billions of dollars. Yet McCain was successfully re-elected four times afterwards and secured the Republican nomination for president in 2008.

Democratic Congressman William Jefferson was returned to Congress in 2006 by his constituents in Louisiana after $90,000 in unexplained bills were found wrapped in aluminum foil in his freezer and he was accused of various criminal schemes. He was subsequently found guilty of multiple counts and sentenced to thirteen years in prison.
         
In the House Banking Scandal from 1988 to 1991, hundreds of Congressmen wrote overdrafts on their House bank accounts. No penalties or fees were assessed and many of those involved were subsequently re-elected.

There were also dozens of Senators and members of Congress who took money from Jack Abramoff to vote certain ways, or to help Abramoff’s clients deal with federal agencies. Both Republicans and Democrats participated in these schemes, among them Senators Harry Reid, Conrad Burns and Byron Dorgan. Congressmen included Tom DeLay, Denis Hastert, J.D. Hayworth, Roy Blount and Patrick Kennedy.

These are only a small fraction of federal legislators involved in unethical activities over the years. Executive branch members have also been compromised, as well as numerous officials at lower levels. But this problem of corruption is not being addressed by voters. They do not hold elected officials to high standards, perhaps reinforcing perverse conduct.  It is time that Americans became more discerning when they vote and less forgiving of corrupt behavior by officeholders. Character is far more important than a candidate’s ideology. Past actions usually predict politicians’ future performance.

Resurrecting Democracy
www.robertlevinebooks.com